Christa Pike was less than an hour away from becoming the first woman Tennessee executed in two centuries when a federal appeals court pulled the plug on September 30, 2026. Her boyfriend at the time of the murder – the guy who helped her do it – never came close to that needle. And the reason?…
Christa Pike was less than an hour away from becoming the first woman Tennessee executed in two centuries when a federal appeals court pulled the plug on September 30, 2026. Her boyfriend at the time of the murder – the guy who helped her do it – never came close to that needle. And the reason? He was 17 when they killed Colleen Slemmer. That’s it. That’s the whole explanation.
The Age Loophole That Saved One Life
Look, I’m not saying Tadaryl Shipp got off easy. He’s been locked up for decades. But he’s breathing, and Pike nearly wasn’t, and when you dig into why, it feels almost arbitrary. Shipp was a minor when he and Pike lured 19-year-old Colleen Slemmer into the woods at their Job Corps Center in Knoxville back in January 1995. Pike was 18. One year made all the difference between a possible death sentence and automatic disqualification from execution.

The law’s pretty clear on this – you can’t execute someone for a crime they committed as a minor. Period. But here’s what gets me: both of them participated in the same horrific act. Same night, same victim, same level of brutality from what the court records show. And yet Pike ended up as Tennessee’s only woman on death row, while Shipp got life with the possibility of parole after 25 years.
What Actually Happened That Night
On January 12, 1995, Pike and Shipp (along with another friend) convinced Slemmer to walk with them into some woods near the Job Corps campus. What happened next was so brutal I’m not going to detail it all here, but prosecutors said Pike became convinced Slemmer was interested in Shipp – teenage jealousy spiraling into something unthinkable. Pike was convicted of leading the attack. She kept a piece of Slemmer’s skull as a trophy. That detail still makes my skin crawl. It's the kind of brutality that echoes other cold cases, like the one involving a girl found strangled decades ago that went unsolved for 57 years.
So Where’s Shipp Now?
Here’s the thing – Shipp’s been in the system this whole time, but his trajectory looks nothing like Pike’s. He got life imprisonment, which for a 17-year-old in 1995 meant decades behind bars but not the finality of death row. Pike, meanwhile, has been appealing her death sentence for over 30 years now, coming within an hour of execution before that last-minute stay.

The disparity raises questions that don’t have comfortable answers. Was Pike more culpable? Prosecutors argued she was the ringleader, sure. But Shipp wasn’t exactly an innocent bystander. He participated. He was there. He helped make it happen. The difference in their sentences comes down almost entirely to that birthday – to whether you’re 17 or 18 when you commit murder.
The Uncomfortable Math of Justice
I’ve covered enough criminal cases to know that sentencing is never perfectly logical. There are aggravating factors, mitigating circumstances, jury composition, quality of defense attorneys – all of it matters. But this case highlights something that bothers a lot of people about how we handle juvenile offenders versus young adults.
We’ve basically decided as a society that there’s something fundamentally different about a 17-year-old’s brain and an 18-year-old’s brain. And neuroscience backs that up to some degree – the prefrontal cortex isn’t fully developed until the mid-20s, impulse control is shakier in teens, all that. The Supreme Court has ruled multiple times that juveniles are less culpable and more capable of rehabilitation.
But when you’re looking at two people who committed the same crime together, and one walks away from the death chamber purely because of a birthday… it just feels weird. I’m not arguing Shipp should’ve been executed – I actually think the law protecting juvenile offenders from death sentences is probably right. What I’m saying is the arbitrariness of it sits uncomfortably.
“That made him a minor under the law – and ineligible for the death penalty.”
What This Actually Means
Pike’s execution was stayed, at least for now. Her legal team continues fighting, arguing ineffective counsel, intellectual disability, you name it. Shipp remains in prison, largely forgotten by the public that was so horrified by this case three decades ago. The victim, Colleen Slemmer, stays 19 forever. It's a dynamic playing out in other high-profile cases too, like when a judge recently shut down a defense team pushing back against the system in the Lindsay Clancy case.
The uncomfortable truth is that our justice system draws bright lines – you’re a juvenile or you’re not, you’re eligible for death or you’re not – and sometimes those lines feel almost random when you zoom in close enough. One person gets to keep living because they were born 13 months later than their co-defendant. That’s justice, technically. But it doesn’t always feel like justice, if I’m being honest. And I think we’re allowed to sit with that discomfort instead of pretending it all makes perfect sense. Sometimes those lines do bend eventually, as seen in cases involving justice finally catching up decades later.