Twenty-two years old. Three-quarters of a million dollars on the line. And Drew Campbell looked a near-guaranteed shot at the money square in the face… and walked away from it. We’re talking about a kid who had Rick Devens dead to rights a week before the Big Brother 28 finale and chose, on…
Twenty-two years old. Three-quarters of a million dollars on the line. And Drew Campbell looked a near-guaranteed shot at the money square in the face… and walked away from it. We’re talking about a kid who had Rick Devens dead to rights a week before the Big Brother 28 finale and chose, on purpose, to keep him around instead. If that doesn’t sound insane to you, you haven’t been paying attention to how this game actually works.
The Vote That’s Going to Haunt Him
Here’s the setup: Drew won the final Power of Veto of the season, which in Big Brother terms is basically being handed a loaded gun with one bullet left in the chamber. He had Dee Valladares, the Survivor winner, sitting right there. He had Rick Devens, 42, sitting right there too. Taylor Brown, the eventual runner-up, was safe as Head of Household and out of the equation entirely. So it came down to Drew, alone, making the sole vote on who stayed and who went.
He picked Devens. He evicted Dee. Rick Devens' path to that final vote says a lot about how losing Survivor twice taught him to win Big Brother.

And look, I get the logic, I really do. Drew told Us, exclusively, “I still stand by the decision,” explaining that if he’d cut Devens loose right then, he would’ve instantly become the biggest target left in the house. That’s not a crazy read of the situation, honestly. But here’s the thing – sometimes the “safe” move in Big Brother is actually the move that gets you quietly ushered out the back door a few days later with a smile and a “good game.” Which, well… that’s basically what happened.
Why Devens Over Dee, Though?
Drew’s reasoning was pretty simple when he broke it down: he said he couldn’t “see a world” where Dee would’ve taken him to the final two. Fair enough, maybe. But he also had a bond with Devens, one built on promises about going to the end together – promises that, shocker, didn’t exactly hold up. I mean, how many times have we watched this exact movie? Two guys shake hands in week six, swear loyalty, and by finale night one of them is holding a check and the other’s doing press rounds explaining why he doesn’t regret anything. It’s basically a Big Brother tradition at this point.
So Did It Actually Cost Him The Money?
This is the question everyone’s asking, and I don’t think there’s a clean answer. Could Drew have beaten Dee in jury votes if he’d taken her instead of Devens? Maybe. Survivor winners carry a certain reputation in these houses – sometimes it helps them, sometimes jurors get spooked and vote against the “threat.” Could he have beaten Devens? We know how that one actually turned out, and it wasn’t in Drew’s favor. It's a lot like how Taylor Brown knew she'd lost before the votes were even read earlier this same season.

Not gonna lie, there’s something almost admirable about a guy who makes a decision, watches it blow up in his face on national television, and still says “yep, I’d do it again.” That takes a certain kind of stubbornness. Or confidence. Or maybe denial. Probably some combination of all three, if I’m being honest.
“Because if I evicted Devens, I would have been the biggest target in the house.”
The Bigger Lesson Here
What’s interesting here isn’t really the vote itself – it’s what it says about how these players think under pressure. Drew wasn’t wrong that keeping Devens around protected him in the short term. He just maybe didn’t think far enough ahead to the actual finale math. That’s the trap. Big Brother isn’t a game you can play one week at a time and expect to walk away with the big check. You’ve got to be thinking three, four moves down the board, like it’s chess and not checkers. Drew played checkers in a chess tournament, and I think deep down he probably knows it.
And look, loyalty’s not nothing in this game. Players who flip on every ally the second it’s convenient usually get burned just as bad, if not worse, come jury time. So I’m not sitting here saying Drew’s an idiot for valuing his word. I’m saying the math on this particular move just didn’t work out, and $750,000 is a brutal price tag to put on a handshake deal.
What This Actually Means
Drew’s going to be fine – he’s 22, he’s got a national TV appearance under his belt, and he’s clearly got no interest in rewriting history to make himself look smarter after the fact, which honestly I respect more than I expected to. But if you’re asking me whether this was the move that cost him the game? Yeah. Probably. He had the knife in his hand and chose not to use it, and in a game built entirely around using the knife at exactly the right moment, that’s the kind of decision that follows you right to the finale stage. Whether he’d actually change it, even now, knowing everything – that’s the part I’m not so sure he’s being fully honest with himself about.